The traction dilemma: why early-stage founders need new rules for proving demand

Every investor meeting follows the same script. You walk in with your pitch, share your vision, and then comes the inevitable question: "What's your traction?"

If you have revenue, active users, and clean retention curves, the conversation continues and you might get a second call. If you don't, the meeting continues and ends politely but definitively. 

Here's the dilemma: you need capital to build traction, but you need traction to raise capital. For hardware companies waiting months for prototypes, or B2B startups facing long sales cycles, or consumer products requiring network effects, this circular problem becomes fatal. Traditional traction takes too long to develop. What counts as validation in the earliest stages needs redefining.

Why traditional metrics don't work

The traction requirement makes sense from an investor perspective. Real metrics reduce risk. Revenue proves people will pay. Active users demonstrate demand. Retention shows the product solves a problem.

But this standard assumes founders can reach these milestones without external capital. For many business models, that assumption breaks down. The current AI wave has made this worse. Investors now believe anyone can reach product-market fit with a $20 per month ChatGPT subscription, ignoring the reality of building real businesses in hardware, enterprise software, or markets requiring deep domain expertise.

Consider a hardware startup building a new category of device. From concept to working prototype takes 12 to 18 months. Manufacturing setup adds another six months. Getting units into customer hands and measuring retention might take two years from founding. Waiting that long to raise capital means the company dies before proving anything.

Software companies face similar challenges, though less extreme. Building a product polished enough for strangers to use takes time. Acquiring users without marketing budget proves difficult. Creating network effects requires scale that bootstrapping can't provide.

There's a middle ground between pure speculation and proven business models. Experienced founders have started exploiting this space through tactics that demonstrate precursor signals to real traction.

What validation looks like before revenue

Precursor traction means showing signals that predict future success without having achieved that success yet. These signals aren't as valuable as revenue or retention, but they're far better than nothing.

The cinematic launch video is the clearest example. A well-produced video costs between $10,000 and $50,000, takes a few weeks to create, and can generate millions of views if executed properly. For a hardware company, spending $50,000 and a month of time to validate demand beats waiting 18 months to manufacture physical units. The video views don't prove people will buy, but they prove people care enough to watch and share.

The video approach works because it exploits platform dynamics. Social media feeds prioritize video content. The format lends itself to storytelling about new products. The production value signals seriousness without being prohibitively expensive. Well-executed videos can still go viral.

But video views represent just one type of precursor traction.

Waitlists and pre-orders sit closer to real traction. Getting someone to provide an email address shows more intent than watching a video. Getting them to put down a deposit shows even more. These tactics let you measure interest before building the full product.

Building in public has become popular for developer tools and productivity software. Sharing progress, gathering feedback, and accumulating followers demonstrates community interest. For products targeting specific professional communities, this validation matters.

Accelerator admission and demo days provide institutional validation. Getting accepted to Y Combinator or similar programs signals that experienced evaluators see potential. The demo day itself creates artificial but useful deadlines for showing progress.

Strategic partnerships and pipeline logos matter for B2B companies. Landing a pilot program with a recognizable enterprise customer proves the problem resonates with your target market, even if revenue hasn't materialized.

Each type of precursor traction answers different questions. The key is choosing tactics that reveal what you need to know about your market.

Making weak signals stronger

Precursor traction solves the timing problem but creates a new challenge: determining what these signals mean.

A video with one million views sounds impressive. But views alone tell you almost nothing about commercial viability. Are viewers in your target market? Do they have buying power? Would they purchase if the product existed?

Founders need to layer multiple validation approaches. A video alone provides weak signal. But a video that drives viewers to a landing page where they provide emails creates a conversion funnel you can analyze. Of those email signups, which companies do they work for? Can you segment by geography, industry, or seniority?

The more steps someone takes, the stronger the signal. Watching a video requires minimal commitment. Providing an email shows more interest. Filling out a survey demonstrates engagement. Scheduling a call indicates serious intent. Placing a pre-order approaches real demand.

Resourceful founders build this progression intentionally. The goal is creating a validation pathway that answers specific questions about your market and product, not accumulating vanity metrics.

For enterprise software, the relevant questions might be: Do decision makers at target companies acknowledge this problem? How do they currently solve it? What would make them switch? Precursor traction should help you answer these questions before building the full product.

For consumer hardware, you need to understand: Does the market perceive this as solving a real problem or creating a toy? What price point feels reasonable? Which features matter most? A launch video combined with targeted surveys can reveal these insights.

Being honest about what you're learning matters. Million-view videos that don't convert to emails might mean the concept is entertaining but not compelling. Lots of emails from students might indicate interest in the wrong demographic. Pilots with small companies might not predict enterprise sales.

Beyond validating demand, precursor traction demonstrates execution capability. Any team can have ideas. Most teams can create basic prototypes. Few teams can orchestrate a successful launch campaign, produce professional content, or generate buzz.

The ability to execute these tactics separates serious founders from aspiring ones. Creating a video that goes viral requires understanding platform dynamics, audience psychology, and content creation. Building a waitlist that grows organically demands growth hacking skills and community building.

When investors evaluate founders who've generated precursor traction, they look beyond the numbers. The team's ability to make things happen matters as much as the metrics themselves. A founding team that can create a viral launch, secure strategic partnerships, or build a community before having a product demonstrates resourcefulness. These are the same skills needed to acquire customers, manage crises, and navigate the chaos of early-stage growth.

This explains why some founders with weak traditional metrics still raise capital. The precursor traction they've built signals competence. An impressive demo day presentation shows communication skills. A well-executed launch campaign demonstrates marketing capability. Strategic partnerships prove business development chops.

The worst outcome is showing you can't execute even these relatively deterministic tactics. If you can't generate buzz with a launch video, selling to customers will be harder. If you can't recruit beta testers, building a team will be harder.

Start with the video views but don't stop there. Drive viewers to a landing page. Capture emails. Segment those emails by value. Reach out to high-value prospects individually. Convert them into design partners or beta customers. You've gone from vanity metrics to actual customer conversations.

Each step up this ladder provides better information and stronger validation. But each step also requires more work and faces higher failure rates. Not every video viewer will provide an email. Not every email signup will take a call. Not every call will convert to a pilot.

You're progressively filtering for interest while learning about your market. The goal is moving up this continuum as quickly as your resources allow.

For B2B companies, the path might look like: launch campaign leads to demo requests, which lead to pilot programs, which lead to paid contracts. For consumer products: viral video leads to waitlist, which leads to pre-orders, which leads to actual sales.

The time compression matters. Traditional advice says build the product, then find customers. This approach reverses the order. Validate interest first, then build. You still need to deliver, but you've reduced risk by confirming demand exists.

When early signals mislead

The danger is mistaking early signals for guaranteed success. Precursor traction reduces risk but doesn't eliminate it.

Many products generate massive early buzz that evaporates when the actual product launches. The concept was more exciting than the execution. The timing was wrong. The market was smaller than the initial interest suggested. Competitors moved faster.

Video views can mislead if they attract the wrong audience. A consumer hardware product that goes viral on tech Twitter might find its actual target market is middle America, not early adopters. The views feel validating but don't predict sales.

Waitlists can deceive if people sign up casually without real intent. Getting 10,000 emails sounds impressive until you realize conversion rates are under 1%. Meanwhile, you've built a product for an audience that doesn't exist at scale.

Strategic partnerships often create false confidence for B2B startups. Landing a pilot with an enterprise customer feels like validation. But pilots fail to convert to paid contracts constantly. The internal champion loses influence. Budget priorities shift. The decision gets delayed.

Maintaining skepticism about your own metrics helps avoid these traps. Ask hard questions about what the signals demonstrate. Are video views translating to downstream action? Do waitlist signups represent your target customer? Will partnerships convert?

Better to discover early that your precursor traction is misleading than to build a product for a market that doesn't exist.

Precursor traction tactics also create forcing functions for execution. Building in public means you have to ship regularly or lose credibility. Announcing a launch date means you have to deliver on that date. Organizing a demo day means you need something to demo. These artificial constraints combat the tendency toward endless iteration.

Many founders struggle because they lack urgency. Without external pressure, product development expands to fill available time. Features get added. Scope creeps. Polish becomes an excuse for delay.

Precursor traction tactics impose deadlines that feel real because they are real. You've told the world you're launching. You've collected emails from interested users. You've committed to showing progress. These commitments create healthy pressure to ship.

The tactics also provide interim goals that make progress tangible. Revenue and retention are outcome metrics that take months or years to achieve. Video views, email signups, and partnership conversations happen faster. They let you demonstrate momentum to your team, your investors, and yourself.

For most early-stage startups, you need precursor traction tactics. The question is which ones to use and how to sequence them. The answer depends on your business model, customer segment, and resource constraints.

For consumer hardware, cinematic launch videos make sense. The visual nature of hardware lends itself to video. The long development cycles make early validation crucial. The ability to go viral on social platforms creates disproportionate reach.

For B2B software, focus on pipeline generation and design partnerships. Launch videos matter less than getting the right logos interested. Accelerators help because they provide access to potential customers. Building in public works if your target users are on those platforms.

For marketplace or network effect businesses, waitlists serve multiple purposes. They validate demand from both sides of the marketplace. They let you control launch timing. They create urgency through artificial scarcity.

Stack multiple approaches that reinforce each other. Don't rely on a single tactic. Build a validation pathway that progressively filters for interest while teaching you about your market.

Start broad with tactics that reach many people but require minimal commitment. Launch videos, social media presence, content marketing create awareness and initial interest.

Layer in tactics that require more commitment but provide better information. Email signups, survey responses, community participation help you understand your audience.

Convert the highest-intent prospects into actual engagement. Design partner agreements, beta programs, pre-orders approach real traction.

The bottom line

The traction dilemma won't resolve itself. Investors will continue demanding proof of demand, and founders will continue needing capital to generate that proof.

Recognizing that multiple types of validation exist helps. Real traction is best, but precursor traction is better than nothing. The goal is moving up the validation ladder as quickly as resources allow while maintaining honest assessment of what your metrics prove.

Success requires understanding what you're trying to learn at each stage. Early on, you're validating that people care about the problem. Later, you're confirming they'll engage with your solution. Eventually, you're proving they'll pay for it.

Different tactics serve different purposes. Choose approaches that answer your most critical uncertainties while demonstrating execution capability. Use early signals to accelerate toward metrics, not as substitutes for them.

The founders who navigate this effectively don't wait for permission to start. They create validation on their own terms, using whatever tools and tactics their situation allows. They stack precursor signals until they've built enough momentum to access real resources. Then they convert that momentum into actual traction.

The path from idea to proven business has always required creative problem solving. Precursor traction tactics simply make that path more visible and more accessible to founders who understand how to use them.

‍